Disclaimer
ADVERTISING MATERIAL www.boselaw.com/disclaimerRSS
Authors
-
Recent Posts
Tag Cloud
- 30 hours of service
- 40 Hours Is Full Time Act
- 2014
- ACA
- affordable care
- Affordable Care Act
- affordable essential health benefit coverage
- Bose McKinney & Evans
- cadillac tax
- COBRA
- Community Rating
- compliance
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Labor
- DOL
- employee benefits attorney
- Employer mandate
- Employer penalties
- enforcement
- Enroll America
- ERISA
- Exchanges
- excise tax
- Final rules
- Form 720
- Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
- full-time employees
- full time employment
- government health care exchanges
- Halbig
- Health and Human Services
- healthcare insurance
- Health Contingent Wellness Plans
- health insurance
- health insurance coverage
- health insurance exchanges
- Health Insurance Marketplaces
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
- HHS
- HIPAA
- HIPAA Enforcement
- HIPAA Privacy Rule
- HIPPA
- Indiana Attorney General
- Indiana public schools
- individual mandate
- insurance coverage
- Internal Revenue Service
- IRS
- January 1
- measurement period
- Model Notices
- Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements
- OCR
- Office of Civil Rights
- Participatory Plans
- part time employees
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
- PCORI
- PCORI fees
- penalties
- PPACA
- protected health information
- reduction of hours
- Representative Luke Messer
- safe harbors
- Self-funded plans
- self-insured health plans
- Senator Joe Donnelly
- SHOP
- SHOP Exchanges
- Small Business Health Option Program
- subsidies
- Wellness programs
Categories
Archives
- January 2018
- October 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- August 2016
- March 2016
- December 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
Tag Archives: ACA
What to do about ACA Reporting
I have been advising employers to wait until February 1, 2017 before starting work on the 2016 1094 and 1095 forms. My hope was that, based upon all of the campaign rhetoric, the ACA reporting obligations would either be further … Continue reading
Posted in Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Tagged 1094, 1095, ACA, ACA Reporting, IRS
Leave a comment
Executive Order Issued on ACA
[Official Guidance] The White House, via Fox News Text of President Trump’s Executive Order: ‘Minimizing the Economic Burden of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pending Repeal’ Signed on Jan. 20, 2017. “To the maximum extent permitted by law, the … Continue reading
Yellow Light (Again): IRS Extends ACA Deadline to Furnish Forms
On November 18, 2016, the IRS extended the due date for employers to furnish 2016 Form 1095-B and Form 1095-C to individuals from January 31, 2017 until March 2, 2017. The IRS stated that the extension is appropriate because a … Continue reading
Yellow Light: IRS Delays Reporting Requirements Again!
Earlier today, the IRS announced an extension of the due dates for IRS Forms 1094 and 1095. In IRS Notice 2016-4, the IRS states that employers are not required to furnish individuals with either Form 1095-B or 1095-C until March … Continue reading
Proposed EEOC Rules Address Wellness Programs
Authored by John Westercamp On April 20, 2015, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) published proposed regulations addressing wellness programs. The EEOC estimates that approximately 400,000-600,000 employers offer wellness programs which are regulated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). … Continue reading
State and 39 schools ask court to spare them from employer mandate
Below is a news release issued from the Office of the Indiana Attorney General: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, October 9, 2014 State and 39 schools ask court to spare them from employer mandate AG: Federal court hears arguments in legal … Continue reading
“Piling On”: IRS Issues Instructions on ACA Reporting Requirements
On August 28, 2014, the IRS issued draft instructions on the reporting requirements for employers subject to the employer shared responsibility provisions. The draft instructions for Forms 1094-C and 1095-C are thirteen pages in length, filled with mind-numbing complexity that … Continue reading
King Decision on ACA Subsidies
On July 22, 2014, two conflicting decisions on the legality of insurance subsidies provided in federally established health care exchanges were handed down. In the Halbig decision, discussed previously in this blog, the D.C. Circuit of the U.S. Court of … Continue reading
Posted in Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Tagged ACA, federal exchanges, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, government health care exchanges, Halbig, health insurance, individual mandate, insurance subsidiaries, Internal Revenue Service, King, King v. Burwell, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, PPACA, subsidies
Leave a comment
The Shaky Future of the ACA Employer Penalty After Halbig
In a previous post, we discussed the murky legal status of insurance subsidies in federally established insurance exchanges. This post will focus on the July 22, 2014 decision in Halbig v. Burwell and the impact this ruling will have if … Continue reading
Conflicting Federal Rulings Issued Today on ACA
Earlier today, two circuits of the U.S. Court of Appeals handed down conflicting rulings regarding the legality of insurance subsidies offered in connection with federally facilitated exchanges. The controversy surrounding these subsidies involves language found in the Affordable Care Act … Continue reading
Posted in Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Uncategorized
Tagged ACA, Bose McKinney & Evans, Burwell, court rulling, federal exchanges, federally facilitated exchanges, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Halbig, Indiana public sh, insurance subsidiaries, King, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, PPACA, State of Indiana vs IRS, statuatory language, subsidies, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Leave a comment